A professional code of ethics statement is a code of ethics statement for all parties involved in the process of publishing this scientific journal (Editor, reviewer, and author). In general, the ethics of Information and Computer Journal publication (JIK) refers to the Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) regarding Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and LIPI Head Regulations Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publication. Basically, the code of ethics itself upholds three ethical values in publications, namely:
- Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in public management),
- Justice (giving authorship to the recipient as a writer)
- Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, forgery, and plagiarism (DF2P) in this publication.
After the author has finished reading the Ethics Statement of this publication, the author must download the Statement of Authenticity of the Writing (Ethical Statement) and Open Access Statement in the Author Package. The Statement of Ethics and the signed Copyright Agreement must be submitted as part of the initial article submission.
The editor is responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to the journal that must be published. Editors can be guided by the editorial board's journal policies and are limited by legal requirements that will apply to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors can communicate with editors or other reviewers in making this decision.
- Fair game
The editor at any time evaluates the manuscript for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author.
Any editor and editorial staff may not disclose any information about the manuscript sent to anyone other than the author concerned, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors and publishers, as appropriate.
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted text may not be used in the editor's own research without the author's written consent.
Contributions to Editorial Decisions Peer reviews help editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with writers can also help authors improve papers. Speed Each selected referee who feels ineligible to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that a quick review is not possible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Confidentiality Every text received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor. The Objection Standards of the Review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Recognition of the Review Source must identify the relevant published work that has not been quoted by the author. Each statement that observations, derivations, or previously reported arguments must be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer should also call the attention of the editor about the substantial or overlapping similarities between the text being considered and any other published papers that have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Special information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers may not consider texts where they have conflicts of interest arising from competition, collaboration, or other relationships or connections with any author, company or institution connected with the paper.
Reporting Standards The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the work carried out as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately represented in the paper. A paper must contain sufficient details and references to enable others to replicate the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior. Originality and Plagiarism Authors must ensure that they have written the original work in full, and if the author has used the work or words of others that this has been quoted or quoted appropriately. Multiple, Neglected, or Simultaneous Publications An author may not generally publish texts that basically describe the same research in more than one journal or main publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is an unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior. Recognition of the Source Proper recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author must quote publications that have an influence in determining the nature of the work reported. Writing Paper Papers must be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research reported. All who have made significant contributions must be registered as co-authors. Where there are other people who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all suitable co-authors and no co-authors are improperly included on paper, and that all co-authors have seen and agreed to the final version of the paper and have agreed to submit it for publication. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any other financial or substantive conflicts of interest that might be interpreted to influence the results or interpretations of their manuscripts. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Fundamental Errors in Published Works When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his self-published work, it is the duty of the author to notify the journal editor or publisher immediately and work with the editor to retract or repair the paper.
STMIK DCC Kotabumi Lampung
SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONRelawan Jurnal Indonesia (RJI)